Rajiv Khosla hits back with SC win against Chandhiok.
Chandhiok had asked that Khosla be restricted from entering the Delhi high court premises on the day of the DHCBA polls this time, and from campaigning through text messages. Legally India and Delhi HC advocates have��.
Congress tips hat to CM for scrapping Modis manifesto
PANAJI: The Congress in Goa on Saturday congratulated chief minister Manohar Parrikar for being the first BJP chief minister to scrap Narendra Modis Lok Sabha election manifesto stand that the nations natural resources like mining ore should be .
SC reserves order on coal blocks
The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its final order on whether 218 illegal coal block allocations should be axed. A packed courtroom of Chief Justice of India R.M. Lodha saw the affected coal miners and power producers cry ���injustice.��� They demanded .
5 judges to hear NJAC challenges on 27 April - Legally India
The Supreme Court will from April 27 start hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the NJAC Act, 2014, and the constitution amendment backing it. The court on Wednesday rejected the plea that��.
Sonia Gandhi hails Rahuls speech in the Parliament
Party whip K C Venugopal, however, said that there was no whip issued to the members and it was only known in the afternoon that Rahul would be speaking. Party sources said that Rahul is expected to utilise to the hilt the remaining short stint of the.
Smart cities: Government working on concept and contours of scheme, says.
In a written reply to Rattan Lal Kataria, KC Venugopal and P Srinivasa Reddy, Shri Naidu furnished details of central assistance under JNNURM which was launched in December, 2005 and closed by the previous government on March 31, 2014.
D.Sudhakar and Ors vs D.N.Jeevanraju and Ors on 25 January.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4510-4514 OF 2011 D. Sudhakar and Ors... The Appellants were given time till 5.00 p.m. on 10th October, 2010, to submit their objections, if any, to the Disqualification Application either in writing or presenting themselves in person, failing which it would be. facie unconstitutional and illegal, besides being motivated and malafide and devoid of jurisdiction. 7.
Centre For Pil and Anr vs Union Of India and Anr on 3 March, 2011
We are, therefore, of the opinion that the aforesaid Government Order has not been shown to be in any way illegal or unconstitutional so far as the rights of the appellants are concerned.. Granting liberty to the parties to... Provided that till such time a notification is issued under this clause, all officers of the said corporations, companies, societies and local authorities shall be deemed to be the persons referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1). 11. Power relating to��.
Behind the scenes: How 90+ lawyers and 3 judges created the biggest free speech.
���I dont think had (Bobde continued hearing the case), the ruling would have (been different), especially because at Justice Bobdes time the arguments were around 66A, so they were not on (website) blocking or the intermediary liability,��� he says.
SILF gives award to Harish Salve for award
Salve commented in a press release: ���I feel very proud but also humbled by this award by the Society of Indian Law Firms. The judiciary has over the six plus decades grown into a powerful institution of constitutional governance. The bar is an integral.
Centres notification illegal, unconstitutional: Venugopal
NEW DELHI: The Delhi government has found support in its tussle with LG Najeeb Jung from two senior lawyers who have described the central governments notification giving LG the final say in posting and transfer of Delhi government bureaucrats as .
[Opinion] HC rewrites Constitution after Governor defies Presidents authority.
Dhananjay: Dissecting a lost caseAdvocate KV Dhananjay argues that a recent decision of the Karnataka high court in one of his cases amounts to a rewriting of the Constitution of India, which is without parallel or precedent in the constitutional.
CBI defends summoning of Sunil Mittal, Ravi Ruia by trial court in spectrum case
Senior advocate KK Venugopal, appearing for CBI, said, we start with the assumption that there is a prima facie evidence against the accused companies. A person or a group of persons, who have been the guiding force behind a company, are responsible .
SC Quashed UPA Govt Notification On Illegal Migrants.
���In a major setback to the UPA government at the Centre, the Apex Court on Tuesday quashed its notification that put the onus of proving an llegal immigrant into the country solely on the complainant.. 131 of 2000 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India against Union of India and others for declaring some of the provisions of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 (for short the IMDT Act) as unconstitutional, null and void and a consequent��.
Advani, Bachchan, Dilip Kumar get Padma Vibhushan
Senior advocate K.K. Venugopal, nuclear scientist M.R. Srinivasan, philanthropist Veerendra Heggade and Sanskrit scholar Rambhadracharya and Karim Al Hussiani Aga Khan are the other awardees of the Padma Vibhushan. Among the 20 names to be awarded the.
SC tells gov to finish pro-NJAC arguments in June holidays.
The Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association along with Bar Association of India, NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others have challenged the constitutional amendment act and the legislation paving way for the NJAC. As the hearing begun in the post lunch session, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi told the court that it would not be possible for him to complete the argument on the merits of the NJAC in such a short time of two and half days.
Rallying public opinion against arbitrary detention | LAW.
THE PUBLIC IN THE REPUBLIC SERIES K.K. Venugopal remembers how his father M.K. NAMBIAR took up the A.K.Gopalan case, challenging the Preventive Detention Act MY FATHER, M.K. Nambiar belonged to a family of landlords.. As a matter of fact, many of the principles relating to fundamental rights and constitutional construction, which were not accepted at that time by the Court was later accepted by the Court in the Bank Nationalisation and Maneka��.
Supreme Court often exceeded its power to fight graft: Senior lawyer Venugopal
No other country in the world has given powers to its Supreme Court the way India has done, Venugopal said. Quoting the former Chief Justice of India P N Bhagwati, Venugopal said the apex court is the most powerful court in the world. In cases like.
.and I am Sid Harth
The court did not take kindly to the probe agencys joint director Ashok Tiwari telling counsel Gopal Shankar Narayan that Venugopal wont appear for CBI in the ongoing case on allegations that its chief Ranjit Sinha was interfering in the probe. Chief Justice HL Dattu. [44] Some legal experts believe that the ultimate solution for Indian government is to formulate a law for CBI as sooner or later the Supreme Court would held the constitution of CBI unconstitutional.[45].
Top 10 news today: Heatwave kills 223 in Andhra, Telangana, Narendra Modis.
Two eminent lawyers today termed unconstitutional and illegal the Centres notification giving absolute powers to Delhi Lt Governor in appointment of bureaucrats and on subjects like police and public order and said the Chief Ministers authority.
The young seniors: We interview Prabhuling Navadgi - Bangalores only new.
The former additional advocate general of Karnataka has represented three chief ministers of the state and dealt with high stake constitutional matters such as on centre state relations, imposition of presidents rule, disqualification of assembly.
SC bench decides it can hear NJAC cases
In a rare move, the bench stressed that it would strictly enforce the argument time limit for each counsel despite involvement of attorney general Mukul Rohatgi and renowned constitutional experts Fali S Nariman, Rajeev Dhavan and three Padma awardees.
SC asks Srinivasan to step down as BCCI chief
Shocked at the revelations in the report submitted by the Justice Mukul Mudgal panel in a sealed cover, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president N. Srinivasan to step down on his own to ensure a fair.
S.T. Sadiq vs State Of Kerala - Indian Kanoon
These petitions raise questions as to the constitutional validity of the Kerala Cashew Factories (Acquisition) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), which has been placed in the 9th Schedule to the Constitution of India,. or if they no desire, appear before Shri N. Gopalan Nair, Additional Director of Industries and Commerce and special office for cashew societies at the District Industries Centre, Kollam at 11 a.m. on 23.9.1985 and state their objections.
Bangalore CCB busts fake IT work experience certificate scam
Police said most of the certificates were issued in the name of Tarangi Infomatics Consultancy Service in Jayanagar, Cionix India Pvt Ltd in BTM Layout, Projenix Infomatics in KEB Layout, Solvent Top Tech India Pvt Ltd in JP Nagar, and Infer Software.
SILF gives award to Harish Salve for award - Legally India
Salve commented in a press release: ���I feel very proud but also humbled by this award by the Society of Indian Law Firms. The judiciary has over the six plus decades grown into a powerful institution of constitutional��.
Behind the scenes: How 90+ lawyers and 3 judges created the.
The substantive arguments for the petitioners had commenced before justices SA Bobde and Chelameswar in November 2014, starting with senior advocates Soli Sorabjee, KK Venugopal, Sajan Poovayya, and advocates Sanjay Parikh. is a different speech medium and how it can have potentially harmful effects, notes Sarvjeet Singh, who attended all hearings in the matter in his capacity as project manager at NLU Delhis Centre for Communication Governance.
Indias top 10 lawyers | LAW RESOURCE INDIA
BY DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA IN TIMES OF INDIA CREST EDITION SATURDAY 9 JANUARY 2010 Drawing up any kind of list is fraught with danger, especially a list of the countrys ten top lawyers!. The SC passed a landmark judgment reinstating Bommai and striking at the notion that the Centre could, without a second thought, invoke Article 356 of the Constitution to get rid of state governments belonging to Opposition... Notify me of new comments via email.
Manohar Lal Sharma vs The Principle Secretary and Others on.
The allocation of coal blocks made during the above period by the Central Government, according to petitioners, is illegal and unconstitutional inter alia on the following grounds:... In order to allow private sector participation in coal mining for captive use for purpose of power generation as well as for other captive end uses to be notified from time to time and to allow the private sector to set up coal washeries, it is considered necessary to amend the Coal and Coal��.
[Opinion] HC rewrites Constitution after Governor defies.
Advocate KV Dhananjay argues that a recent decision of the Karnataka high court in one of his cases amounts to a rewriting of the Constitution of India, which is without parallel or precedent in the constitutional history of India.. The said Notification dated 14 May 2014, in pertinent part, says: ���NOW. That is, notwithstanding what Article 317(2) has in fact said, the High Court has considered changed times as an invitation to it to rewrite the Constitution for the present.
The young seniors: We interview Prabhuling Navadgi.
The former additional advocate general of Karnataka has represented three chief ministers of the state and dealt with high stake constitutional matters such as on centre state relations, imposition of presidents rule, disqualification of assembly. Navadgi said that he had had the privilege of assisting senior counsels KK Venugopal, Ram Jethmalani, Mukul Rohatgi, Soli Sorabjee and Harish Salve, of which his experience with Venugopal stood out in particular.
Anirudh Kumar vs Municipal Corp. Of Delhi - Indian Kanoon
6 and 7 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-owners) initially started a Pathological Lab in the name of Dr. Dangs Diagnostic Centre in the year 1995 on the basement and ground floor of the concerned building and later on,.. senior counsel that the appellant has been complaining about the set-back area of the building being illegally covered by the respondent-owners contrary to the building bye- laws and for the first time before this Court, a new plea has��.